<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Costs and Benefits of Needle Exchange</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.laurencecaromba.com/2009/08/07/the-costs-and-benefits-of-needle-exchange/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.laurencecaromba.com/2009/08/07/the-costs-and-benefits-of-needle-exchange/</link>
	<description>Politics, culture and foreign affairs</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 18:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Son of Apes and Pigs</title>
		<link>http://www.laurencecaromba.com/2009/08/07/the-costs-and-benefits-of-needle-exchange/comment-page-1/#comment-164</link>
		<dc:creator>Son of Apes and Pigs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 15:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laurencecaromba.com/?p=1575#comment-164</guid>
		<description>"In short, the state can not use needles as a policy instrument to reduce the prevalence of drug use amongst the population."

Surely it has been shown by now that there is nothing states can do to stem the prevalence of drug use among their populations- especially when the drug dealers have far more influence, motivation and funding than the agencies designated to combat them? 

If giving out clean needles is okay then why not let the state sell clean drugs. If people are gonna use then they are gonna use. In my mind it would be far more preferable that the billions spent on using don't get into the hands of criminal and terrorist thugs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;In short, the state can not use needles as a policy instrument to reduce the prevalence of drug use amongst the population.&#8221;</p>
<p>Surely it has been shown by now that there is nothing states can do to stem the prevalence of drug use among their populations- especially when the drug dealers have far more influence, motivation and funding than the agencies designated to combat them? </p>
<p>If giving out clean needles is okay then why not let the state sell clean drugs. If people are gonna use then they are gonna use. In my mind it would be far more preferable that the billions spent on using don&#8217;t get into the hands of criminal and terrorist thugs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
